TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE NEW ECONOMY

Introduction. The question on the role of knowledge in the economy was raised at the beginning of the twentieth century, but there is still no comprehensive typology of knowledge in terms of improving the policy of regional development. This article fills this gap by summarizing and critically analyzing ideas about different types of knowledge that are of value and are the most important factors of production in a modern, innovation-oriented economy. The purpose of the study is to identify existing types of knowledge and determine their characteristic features, based on the logic of dual perception of knowledge with an object-process approach. Materials and methods of the research. The article contributes to the enhancement of theoretical and methodological ideas about the typology of knowledge at the intersection of economics and economic geography. The study uses the method of structural review, defragmenting the types of knowledge by semiotic characteristics, by stages of the life cycle, by timeline, by openness of access and freedom of use, by propositionality and degree of complexity. Research results. The theoretical and methodological specificity of registering knowledge as an object and process with respect to territorial, institutional, functional, organizational, structural, temporary, and cognitive factors is shown. The lack of tools for accounting for different types of knowledge at the regional level is revealed. Registration of the created and direct evaluation of accumulated knowledge of various types is possible only with its codification, while the assessment of implicit knowledge is carried out indirectly. Conclusion. The results of the study confirm the importance of the diversity of knowl- edge in the new economy and the presence of signiicant differences between different knowledge types, which should be taken into account when developing approaches and methods to managing the intellectual capital of regions.

knowledge typology, knowledge type, tacit knowledge, implicit knowledge, scientific knowledge, knowledge economy

1. Бабурин В. Л. , Земцов С. П. Инновационный потенциал регионов России: монография. М. : Университетская книга, 2017.

2. Беляев Д. О. , Мойсбургер П. География знания как одно из передовых направлений современной географической науки // Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая, 2011. № 2. С. 7-16.

3. Schumann J. Human capital, knowledge and knowledge sharing: a view from the history of economic thoughts / E. Helmstadter (ed. ) // The Economics of Knowledge Sharing: A New Institutional Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp. 121-128.

4. Ibert O. Towards a geography of knowledge creation: the ambivalences between "knowledge as an object" and "knowing in practice" // Regional Studies, 2007, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 103-114. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00343400601120346.

5. Koessler F. Common knowledge and interactive behaviours // Workshop BETA "Economie des connaissances", 1999, 11-12 November, Strasbourg.

6. Autant-Bernard C. The geography of knowledge spillovers and technological proximity // Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2001, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 237-254. https://doi.org/10. 1080/ 10438590100000010.

7. Boulding K. E. The economics of knowledge and the knowledge of economics // The American Economic Review, 1966, vol. 56, no. /4, pp. 1-13.

8. Lundvall B. -A. , Johnson B. The learning economy // Journal of Industry Studies, 1994, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 23-42. https://doi.org/10 1080/13662719400000002.

9. Von Hayek F. A. Economics and Knowledge // Economica, 1937, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 33-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548786.

10. Nonaka I. , Takeuchi H. The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford Press, 1995. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3

11. Frenken K. , Hoekman J. Spatial scientometrics and scholarly impact: a review of recent studies, tools, and methods / Ding Y. , Rousseau R. , Wolfram D. (eds) // Measuring Scholarly Impact. Cham: Springer, 2014, pp. 127-146. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-319-10377-8_6.

12. Matthiessen C. W. , Schwarz A. W. Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators // Urban Studies, 1999, vol . 36, no . 3, pp . 453-477. https://doi . org/10. 1080/0042098993475.

13. Balcerzak A. P. , Pietrzak M. B. Quality of Institutions for Knowledgebased Economy within New Institutional Economics Framework Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for European Countries in the Years 2000-2013 // Economics and Sociology, 2016, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 66-81. https://doi.org/10. 14254/2071- 789X.2016/9-4/4.

14. Godin B. The knowledge-based economy: conceptual framework or buzzword? // The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2005, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17-30. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10961-005-5010-x

15. Лебедев С. А. , Лебедев К. С. , Коськов С. Н. Виды научного знания: различие и единство // Вестник Северо-Восточного федерального университета им М К Аммосова Серия: Педагогика Психология . Философия, 2017, Т. 6, № 2, С . 57-66

16. Ayer A. J. The Problem of Knowledge. London: Penguin, 1956.

17. Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension Garden City (NY): Anchor Books, 1996.

18. Styhre A. Understanding knowledge management: critical and postmodern perspectives Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, 2003.

19. Davenport T. H., Prusak L Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know // Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.

20. Spender J -C. Organizational knowledge, learning, and memory: three concepts in search for a theory // Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1996, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63-78. https://doi.org/10. 1108/09534819610156813.

21. Spender J -C. Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm // Organization, 1998, no. 5, pp. 233-256. https://doi.org/10. 1177/135050849852005.

22. Ancori B. The economics of knowledge: the debate about codification and tacit knowledge // Industrial and Corporate Change, 2000, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 255-287. https://doi.org/10. 1093/icc/9.2.255.

23. Antonelli C. The derived demand for knowledge // Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2016, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 183194. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10438599. 2016. 1202518.

24. Castellacci F. , Archibugi D. The technology clubs: the distribution of knowledge across nations // Research Policy, 2008, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1659-1673.

25. Yigitcanlar T. Editorial: Understanding the multidimensional nature of innovation in the era of knowledge-based economy // International Journal Knowledge-Based Development, 2016, vol 7, no 3, pp 203-206.

26. Malecki E. J. Everywhere? The geography of knowledge // Journal of Regional Science, 2010, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 493-513. https://doi.org/10. 1467-9787.2009. 00640. x.

27. Lundvall B . -A. The economics of knowledge and learning / J . L. Christensen and B . -A. Lundvall (eds . ) // Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance (Research on Technological Innovation and Management Policy, vol 8 Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004, pp . 21-42 . https://doi . org/10 . 1016/S0737-1071(04)08002-3.

28. Lonnqvist A. , Kapyla J. , Salonius H. , Yigitcanlar T. Knowledge that matters: identifying regional knowledge assets of Tampere Region // European Planning Studies, 2014, vol 22, no 10, pp 2011-2029 https://doi.org/10. 1080/09654313. 2013. 814621.

29. Clark H. H., Brennan S. E. Grounding in communication / Resnick, L. B. , Levine, J. M. and Teasley, S. D. (Eds) // Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1991, pp. 127-149.

30. Nonaka I. , Toyama R. , Konno N. SECI, Ba and leadership: a uni-ied model of dynamic knowledge creation // Long Range Planning, 2000, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 5-34. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6.

31. Syazwan Abdullah M. , Kimble C. , Benest I. Paige R Knowledge based systems: a reevaluation // Journal of Knowledge Management, 2006, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 127-142. https://doi.org/10 1108/13673270610670902.

32. Alavi M. , Leidner D. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues // Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2001, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107-135.

33. Allee V. Evolving business forms for the knowledge economy / C. W. Holsapple (ed. ) // Handbook on knowledge management, 2003, vol 2, pp 605-622.

34. Holsapple C. W. , Joshi K. Knowledge manipulation activities: Results of a Delphi study // Information and Management, 2002, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 477-490. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0378-7206(01)00109-4

35. McAdams R. , McCreedy S. A. critical review of knowledge management models // International Journal of the Learning Organisation, 1999, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 91-100. https://doi.org/10. 1108/09696479910270416

36. McCampbell A. S. , Clare L. M. , Gitters S. H. Knowledge management: The new challenge for the 21st century // Journal of Knowledge Management, 1999, vol 3, no 3, pp 171-179 https://doi.org/10. 1108/13673279910288572.

37. Balland P. -A. , Rigby D. The geography of complex knowledge // Economic Geography, 2016, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/ 10. 1080/00130095.2016.1205947.

38. Stehr N. A world made of knowledge // Society, 2001, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 89-92. https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF02712625

39. Thrift N. Steps to an ecology of place / Massey D , Allen J , Sarre P (Eds) // Human Geography Today Cambridge: Polity, 1999, pp 295-322.

40. Cooke P., Leydesdorff L. Regional development in the knowledgebased economy: the construction of advantage // The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2005, vol 31, no 1, pp 5-15 https://doi.org/10 1007/s10961-005-5009-3

41. Горин В. А., Земскова Е. С. Мониторинг инновационной безопасности на основе индекса экономики знаний // Вестник евразийской науки, 2015 . Т. 7 . № 5. С. 31. https://dx. doi . org/10 15862/92EVN515 .

42. Земцов С. П., Бабурин В. Л. Как оценить эффективность региональных инновационных систем в России? // Инновации, 2017, Т. 220, № 2, С. 60-66.

43. Земцов С. П., Бабурин В. Л., Баринова В. А. Как измерить неизмеримое? Оценка инновационного потенциала регионов России // Креативная экономика, 2015, Т. 9. № 1. С. 35-52. DOI: 10. 18334/ce.9.1.79.

44. Козлова А. В. К вопросу об измерении экономики, основанной на знаниях: теоретический и методический аспекты // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета, 2016. Т. 384, № 2. С. 202-213.

45. Костюк В. Н. Специфика экономики, основанной на знаниях // Общественные науки и современность, 2004, № 4. С. 134-144.

46. Кукушкин С. Н. Оценка индекса знаний региона // Вестник Российского экономического университета им Г В Плеханова, 2019. Т. 104. № 2, С. 130-141. https://doi.org/10. 21686/24132829-2019-2-130-141.

47. Ферова И. С., Старцева Ю. И. , Инюхина Е. В. Составляющие индекса «экономики знаний» // ЭКО, 2006. Т. 2. № 12. С. 59-66. http://dx. doi.org/10. 30680/ECO0131-7652-2006-12-59-66.

48. Филатов С. А., Сухорукова Н. Г. Экономика, основанная на знаниях: информационно-статистический аспект исследования // Вестник НГУЭУ, 2016, № 3, С. 49-59.