Preview

Наука. Инновации. Технологии

Расширенный поиск

THE EXPERIENCE IN INFORMATION SUPPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES WITH REGIONAL SPECIFICS

https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2021.4.4

Аннотация

Introduction. The article describes and summarizes the experience of different countries in developing the information systems supporting the management of territories and their sustainable development. Some countries, such as the USA, Australia, Great Britain, and others, made great strides in developing such systems at the national level. The article also provides examples of spatial databases for the territories of Saudi Arabia, Hungary, coastal regions of Spain, etc. The basis for the territorial management support system is the spatial data infrastructure (SDI), which provides data storage, updating, access to data, as well as their visualization in the form of maps, graphs or tables. For a long time, geoportals were considered one of the most effective types of spatial data infrastructures, combining many functions necessary for displaying spatial information and effective management. However, now geoportals are being replaced by information and analytical systems of a new generation that goes beyond the SDI concept and are called geospatial ecosystems. Materials and research methods. The tasks of information support of territorial development projects from the perspective of sustainable development are set at all territorial levels, from global to local. At the global level, statistical data is collected by countries and regions of the world within the framework of the work of the largest international organizations: The United Nations, the World Bank, WHO, UNESCO, the International Labor Organization, the International Tourism Organization, etc. As a rule, this data is publicly available and published on the websites of organizations and in annual reports. The results of the study and their discussion: For a long time, geoportals were considered one of the most effective types of spatial data infrastructures, combining many functions necessary for effective territory management (Gamez et al., 2019). However, in recent years, geoportals have been replaced by new-generation information and analytical systems that go beyond the SDI concept and are called geospatial ecosystems. The metaphor "ecosystem" in this case conveys the fundamental concept of a dynamic, complexly organized, stable, adaptive multi-user geoinformation environment (Strobl, 2021; Shao et al., 2012).The transition from SDI to a geospatial ecosystem is driven by a continuous increase in the volume of generated spatial information, an increase in the number of platforms and services based on geodata, and the emergence of new challenges in data management, including in the field of data protection and cyber-security.

Об авторах

O. Chereshnya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Россия


P. De Maeyer
Research group CartoGIS
Россия


M. Gribok
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Россия


K. Milleville
Research group CartoGIS
Россия


V. Tikunov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Россия


V. Samuel
Research group CartoGIS
Россия


N. Van De Weghe
Research group CartoGIS
Россия


Список литературы

1. Acharya, P. S. and Pandey, S., 2018 National Spatial Data Infrastructure India (NSDI-India) - Present Status and the Future Strategies In Geospatial Infrastructure, Applications and Technologies: India Case Studies (p. 7-16) Springer, Singapore.

2. Agbaje, GI 2008 National Geospatial Data Infrastructure (NGDI): An Enabler for Socio-Economic Improvement in Nigeria In GSDI 10 International Conference for Spatial Data Infrastructure, University of West Indies, Trinidad, 25-29 February, 2008 (www gsdi org/gsdi10/papers/TS46 5paper pdf), p. 8.

3. Alshehri, Saad Abdulrahman F. “National spatial data infrastructure collaboration for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” PhD diss., University of Nottingham, 2011.

4. Blancas, F. J., González, M., Lozano-Oyola, M. and Perez, F., 2010. The assessment of sustainable tourism: Application to Spanish coastal destinations Ecological Indicators, 10(2), p. 484-492.

5. Borón, V., Payán, E., MacMillan, D. and Tzanopoulos, J., 2016. Achieving sustainable development in rural areas in Colombia: Future scenarios for biodiversity conservation under land-use change LandUsePolicy, 59, p. 27-37.

6. Burja C., Burja V. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS: A CHALLENGE FOR ROMANIA Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ). 2014 Aug 1;13(8).

7. Ciski, M., Rząsa, K., &Ogryzek, M. (2019). Use of GIS Tools in Sustainable Heritage Management - The Importance of Data Generalization in Spatial Modeling Sustainability, 11(20), 5616.

8. Dudin M. N., Ivashchenko N. P. World experience and trends of innovative development of the Arctic territories // MIR (Modernization Innovations Development). 2015. T. 6. № 4-1(24).

9. El-Hallaq, M. A., Alastal, A. I., &Salha, R. A. (2019). Enhancing Sustainable Development through Web Based 3D Smart City Model Using GIS and BIM Case Study: Sheikh Hamad City Journal of Geographic Information System, 11(03), 321.

10. Galli, A., Đurović, G., Hanscom, L. and Knežević, J., 2018. Think globally, act locally: Implementing the sustainable development goals in Montenegro Environmental science & policy, 84, p. 159-169.

11. Gamez M.R., Perez A.V., Falcones V.A., Bazurto J.J. The geoportal as strategy for sustainable development International journal of physical sciences and engineering. 2019 Jan 8;3(1):10-21.

12. Giuliani, G., Mazzetti, P., Santoro, M., Nativi, S., Van Bemmelen, J., Colangeli, G., & Lehmann, A. (2020). Knowledge generation using satellite earth observations to support sustainable development goals (SDG): A use case on Land degradation InternationalJournalofAppliedEarthObservationandGeoinformation, 88, 102068.

13. Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography GeoJournal, 69, 211-221.

14. Klimach, A., Dawidowicz, A. and Źróbek, R., 2018 The Polish land administration system supporting good governance Land Use Policy, 79, p. 547-555.

15. Kolbovsky E. Yu., Bragin P. N., Medovikova U. A. Geographical information systems for landscape management in territories of outstanding natural and historical value // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2012. Vol. 3. № 4.

16. Koshkarev A. V. Problems of the formation of Russian IPD Materials of the International conference “InterCarto InterGIS» 2014; 20:145-159.

17. Manning D. B., Bemmann A., Bredemeier M., Lamersdorf N., Ammer C., editors Bioenergy from dendromass for the sustainable development of rural areas John Wiley & Sons; 2015. Nov. 16.

18. Mhangara, P., Lamba, A., Mapurisa, W., &Mudau, N. (2019). Towards the Development of Agenda 2063 Geo-Portal to Support Sustainable Development in Africa ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(9), 399.

19. Moussiopoulos, N., Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C., Spyridi, D. and Nikolaou, K., 2010. Environmental, social and economic information management for the evaluation of sustainability in urban areas: A system of indicators for Thessaloniki, Greece Cities, 27(5), p. 377-384.

20. Palya, T., Mihály, S., Remetey-Fülöpp, G., Zentai, L. Hungarian GIS Data for the Sustainable Development Goals, Conference EFGS, 2018, Helsinki Web Resource: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tamas_Palya/publication/328232743_Hungarian_GIS_data_for_sustainable_development_goals/links/5bc05346a6fdcc2c91f71f45/Hungarian-GIS-data-forsustainable-development-goals

21. Samsudin, S., Lim, L. C. and McCluskey, W., 2011. A review of organizational arrangements in Malaysia land administration system towards good governance: issues and challenges In FIG Working Week (pp. 18-22).

22. Shao, J., Kuk, G., Anand, S., Morley, J. G., Jackson, M. J. and Mitchell, T., 2012. Mapping collaboration in open-source geospatial ecosystem Transactions in GIS, 16(4), p. 581-597.

23. Sinnott, R. O., Galang, G., Tomko, M. and Stimson, R., 2011, December Towards an e-infrastructure for urban research across Australia In 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on eScience (pp. 295-302) IEEE.

24. Strobl, J. (2021). Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) ist tot, es lebe das Geospatial Ecosystem! GIS-Business. 16. P. 45-46.

25. Tan, Y., Xu, H. and Zhang, X., 2016. Sustainable urbanization in China: A comprehensive literature review Cities, 55, p. 82-93.

26. Wang H., Pan Y., Luo X. Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis // Automation in Construction. 2019. Т. 103. P. 41-52.

27. Xiao, W., Mills, J., Guidi, G., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Barsanti, S. G., & González-Aguilera, D.(2018). Geoinformatics for the conservation and promotion of cultural heritage in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and RemoteSensing, 142, 389-406.

28. Zolfani, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani, and Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas “Sustainable development of rural areas’ building structures based on local climate ” Procedia Engineering 57 (2013): 1295-1301.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,   . Наука. Инновации. Технологии. 2021;(4):63-76. https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2021.4.4

For citation:


Chereshnya O.Y., De Maeyer P., Gribok M.V., Milleville K., Tikunov V.S., Samuel V.A., Van De Weghe N. THE EXPERIENCE IN INFORMATION SUPPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES WITH REGIONAL SPECIFICS. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2021;(4):63-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2021.4.4

Просмотров: 58


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-4758 (Print)