The effect of anisotropy оn the elastic properties of rock
https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.2.7
Abstract
With the growing interest in hard-to-recover hydrocarbon reserves, there is a need to increase the detail and quality of modeling the rock mass and reservoir formation. Taking into account the mechanical anisotropy of the medium, in particular caused by the layering of thin layers, provides a more complete picture of the stress-strain state of both the reservoir formation itself and barriers / bridges, which in turn opens up additional opportunities for optimizing the processes of field development, increasing the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing, as well as drilling wells. The technology of conducting laboratory studies of core material to study the anisotropy of elastic properties is described in the present study. Based on the results, the correlations for the elastic characteristics of rocks of the Sortym, Bazhenov and Abalak formations were obtained. Using the example of one of the deposits in Western Siberia, the results of constructing two types of hemechanical models (isotropic and anisotropic) are demonstrated. With the reference to comparison of values of the minimum horizontal stress and the absorption onset gradient, it is shown that the anisotropy of elastic properties has a significant effect on the stress-strain state of the rock mass. The use of isotropic models for anisotropic media leads to a significant underestimation of horizontal stresses / gradients of the onset of absorption, which, in turn, does not allow to unlock the potential of hydraulic fracturing, as well as to choose the optimal depth range for casing descent, which is critically important when drilling wells under conditions of AHFP. The obtained dependences can be used as a priori information in constructing geomechanical models of these objects in Western Siberia.
About the Authors
V. S. KuleshovRussian Federation
Vasiliy S. Kuleshov – Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Expert of the Department of Geological and Geophysical Projects
1, Ramenskiy Blvd, Moscow, 119607
B. N. Nedomovnyi
Russian Federation
Bogdan N. Nedomovnyi – Leading Specialist of the Geomechanics Project Development Department
42, Maxim Gorky St., Tyumen, 625000
A. .Ju. Kudymov
Russian Federation
Alexey Ju. Kudymov – Head of Geomechanical Rock Research Department
42, Maxim Gorky St., Tyumen, 625000
N. A. Rasputin
Russian Federation
Nikolay A. Rasputin – Head of the Department of Geological and Field Works
16B, Geologorazvedchikov St., Novy Urengoy, 629306
N. Ju. Yurieva
Russian Federation
Natalia Ju. Yurieva – Main Specialist of the Department of Geological and Field Works
16B, Geologorazvedchikov St., Novy Urengoy, 629306
References
1. Thiercelin MJ, Plumb RA. Core-based prediction of lithologic stress contrasts in East Texas formations Society of Petroleum Engineers. 1994;9(4):251-258. https://doi.org/10.2118/21847-PA
2. Knorr AF. The Effect of Rock Properties on Fracture Conductivity in the Eagle Ford and Fayetteville shales. Texas A & M University; 2016. 124 p.
3. Tsuneyama F, Mavko G. Velocity anisotropy estimation for brine-saturated sandstone and shale. The Leading Edge. 2005;24:82-888. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2056371
4. Vernik L, and X Liu. Velocity anisotropy in shales. A petrophyscial study: Geophysics. 1997;(62): 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444162
5. Higgins S, Goodwin S, Donald A, Bratton T, Tracy G. Anisotropic stress models improve completion design in the Baxter shale. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 2008;(62):2-10. https://doi.org/10.2118/115736-MS
6. Pavlyukov N, Pavlov V, Samoilov M, Prokhorov A, Korolev A, Yagudin R, Kamionko M, Aleksandrov A, and Danil S. TIV-Anisotropy in Geomechanical Modeling for Planning of Hydraulic Fracturing at the Kharampurskoye Field SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference. 2020;12-21. https://doi.org/10.2118/202049-MS
7. Crawford B, Liang Y, Gaillot P, Amalokwu K, Wu X, Valdez R Determining Static Elastic Anisotropy in Shales from Sidewall Cores: Impact on Stress Prediction and Hydraulic Fracture Modeling Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC). 2020;1-8. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2020-2206
8. Higgins S, Goodwin S, Donald A, Bratton T, Tracy G. Anisotropic Stress Models Improve Completion Design in the Baxter Shale Proceedings – SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2008;2-10. https://doi.org/10.2118/115736-MS
9. Close D, Cho D, Horn F, Edmundson H. The sound of sonic: a historical perspective and introduction to acoustic logging. CSEG Recorder. 2009;34(5):34-43.
10. GOST 21153.0. Mountain rocks. Sampling and general requirements and methods of physical tests. Moscow: Publishing House of Standards; 1982. р. 3. (In Russ).
11. Moore DE, Lockner DA. Crystallographic controls on the frictional behavior of dry and water-saturated sheet structure minerals: Journal of Geophysical Research. 2004;109(3):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB00258210.1029/2003JB002582
12. McPhee C, Reed J, Zubizarreta I. Core analysis: a best practice guide: Elsevier, 2015. P. 829.
13. Pavlov V.A., Kuleshov V.S., Kudymov A.Yu., Yakubovskiy A.S., Subbotin M.D., Ptashnyy A.V., Abzgildin R.R., Maksimov E.V. Influence of the nature of the saturating agent on the elastic-strength properties of gas field rocks. Exposition Oil Gas, 2021;(1):11-16. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-6785-2021-1-11-16
14. Sone Hiroki, Zoback Mark. Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir rocks – Part 1: Static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy. Geophysics. 2013;78:381-392. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0050.1
Review
For citations:
Kuleshov V.S., Nedomovnyi B.N., Kudymov A..., Rasputin N.A., Yurieva N.J. The effect of anisotropy оn the elastic properties of rock. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2025;(2):153-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.2.7