Assessment of shock resistance of the light industry of Russia in modern conditions
https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.3.2
Abstract
The article studies theoretical and methodological issues of resilience of the sectors of the domestic light industry in the spatio-temporal aspect. Based on the concept of cyclicity and resilience, the authors presented the analysis of the state of light industry in the post-Soviet period, revealing the dynamics of the development of its key sectors in the territorial context. The object is light industry, which is the oldest industry of both the world and national economy, is characterized by structural complexity and variety of functions performed. The article emphasizes that throughout the long history, light industry experienced periods of rise and crises caused by the consequences of industrial revolutions, the development of world trade, and the emergence of new goods. The shocks and stresses of various depths and coverage of the territory were manifested both at the global and regional levels, Russia included. Special territorial organization of the light industry has developed in Russia, regions and cities have been formed with specialization in the production of fabrics, clothing and shoes. Currently, they are experiencing complex transformation processes. They are in search of ways to overcome the crisis, due to an increase in competition from the Asian countries and restrictions on the part of the West. The stability of light industry to the sanctions (shock) restrictions and challenges of the world context is the basis for sustainable development of the regions of central Russia and its cities, for which these production are city-forming. Studies have shown that the textile industry is least dependent on external challenges. It is characterized by relative resilience compared to knitting and shoe industries. In the territorial context, the Central Federal District turned out to be the most shock-resistant due to the diverse nomenclature series of products, high concentration and modernization of production. Less stable is the Far-Eastern Federal District with a small number of own enterprises and the proximity of Asian industries.
About the Authors
T. A. Balina
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Balina – Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), Associate Professor of the Department of Socio-Economic Geography
15, Bukireva St., Perm, 614068
M. A. Pospishenko
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Pospishenko – Postgraduate student of the Department of Socio-Economic Geography
15, Bukireva St., Perm, 614068
References
1. Maksakovsky VP. General economic and social geography. Course of lectures. In two parts. Part 2. M.: Vlados; 2009. P. 273-278. (In Russ.).
2. Kondratiev ND. Large conjuncture cycles. Conjuncture issues. M.; 1925 vol. 1 issue. 1. P. 28-79. (In Russ.).
3. Schumpeter JA. Theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow: Exmo; 2007. 864 p. (In Russ.).
4. Baburin VL. Innovation cycles in the Russian economy. M: Krasanda; 2018. 216p. (In Russ.).
5. Glazyev SYu. Theory of long-term technical and economic development. M.: Vladar; 1993. (In Russ.).
6. Sharygin MD, Stolbov VA. Theoretical and methodological aspects of the search for laws and patterns in public geography. Geographical Bulletin. 2020;1 (52): 22-32. (In Russ.).
7. Silin YP, Animitsa EG, Novikova NV. Ural Macro -Region: Large Cycles of Industrialization. Monograph. Yekaterinburg, Ural State Economic University; 2019. 371 p. (In Russ.).
8. Vlasova NYu, Sulimin VV. The budget balance of municipalities in the context of the concept of gluttony. Finances and society: new realities, new formats, new financial instruments materials of the I All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Responsible for the release of M.S. Maramygin, responsible editor NA Istomin. Yekaterinburg; 2023. P.143-146. (In Russ.).
9. Zemtsov SP. Factors of the glochesiveness of the regions of Russia in the conditions of sanctions. Metamorphoses of modern Russian space: priorities of socio-geographical analysis. Materials of the International Scientific Conference (XV Scientific Assembly of Argo). Krasnodar; 2024. S. 95-99. (In Russ.).
10. Pesotsky AA. Economic shock and resistance: the relationship of concepts. Theory and practice of social development. 2021;(8):55-60. (In Russ.).
11. Pesotsky AA. Assessment of shock influences on the economy of Russia and its regions (some approaches). Problems of transforming and regulating regional socio-economic systems. Subject of scientific papers. Institute of Problems of the Regional Economy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. St. Petersburg; 2022. P. 124-131. (In Russ.).
12. Novikova IV, Ravino AV. Assessment of statistical indicators for identifying threats to the development of the digital economy at the level of the EAEU integration grouping. Proceedings of BSTU. Series 5: Economics and Management. 2024;1(280):5-15. doi 10.52065/2520-6877-2024-280-1.
13. Bainev VF, Gorayeva TYu. Resource-usefulness approach to the study of socio-economic systems as a theoretical basis for their safe development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics. 2023. Р. 51–60. (In Russ.).
14. Danilova IV, Antonyuk VS, Bogdanova OA. Resistance of monoprofile regions in conditions of external shocks: assessment and managerial decisions. Manager. 2023;14(6):33-49. doi: 10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-6-3. EDN: Bkswtz (In Russ.).
15. Balina TA, Spice MA, Ponomareva ZV. The laws of dialectics in relation to the diagnosis of light industry in Russia. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series Geography and Geoecology. 2022;4(40):92-104. doi 10.26456/2226-7719-2022-4-92-104 (In Russ.).
16. Official website of the Federal State Statistics Service/ Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru [Accessed 10 January 2025]. (In Russ.).
17. Dmitrieva OG. Regional economic diagnosis. St. Petersburg: Publishing House Waifa; 1992. 274 p. (In Russ.).
18. Zemtsov SP, Voloshinskaya AA. Resistance to shocking economies of Russian regions in conditions of sanctions. Journal of the New Economic Association. 2024;3(64):54-83. (In Russ.).
19. Krasilnikov DG, UraSova AA. The development of light industry in the Perm Territory in modern conditions: problems and prospects. Bulletin of the Perm University. Ser. «Economy». 2016;2(29):135-144. (In Russ.).
20. Tsvetkov KL. Crisis of light industry and its social consequences. Problems of Economics and Management, 2012;(1):89- 95. (In Russ.).
21. Official website of Legprom. Available from: https: //phiv.rus [Accessed 20 April 2025].(In Russ.).
22. Balina TA, Pospishenko MA, Chekmeneva LYu. Features of the development of light industry in the resource region (for the example of the Perm Territory). Fundamental and applied aspects of sustainable development of resource regions. Collection of scientific articles III (XX) of the All - Russian Scientific Conference with international participation. Under the general edition of O.S. Andreeva. Novokuznetsk; 2022. P. 25-29.
Review
For citations:
Balina T.A., Pospishenko M.A. Assessment of shock resistance of the light industry of Russia in modern conditions. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2025;(3):41-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.3.2
Views:
44
Email this article 