Feasibility study for the choice of the development system for a massive oil rim of a large offshore field in the North of the Сaspian sea
https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.4.5
Abstract
The oil recovery factor in the development of oil rims remains low compared to conventional oil reservoirs, which is attributed to intensive gas breakthroughs from the gas cap, high gas mobility, bottom water encroachment, and the complexity of controlling displacement processes. In global practice, the development of such assets often leads to increased project costs, since the strategy choice is frequently determined not by geological and physical conditions but by infrastructural or economic factors. New technologies and an integrated approach to development planning make it possible to efficiently exploit these hard-to-recover resources.
This paper presents the rationale for selecting a development strategy for the oil rim of a one field in the Northern Caspian Sea, which is currently at the design stage. The complex geological structure, low effective thickness, and the presence of a gas cap require the implementation of an individual development system involving horizontal wells and reservoir pressure maintenance strategies.
The methodological basis of the study was dynamic simulation using a sector model. Four development strategies were compared: development of the gas cap, oil rim only, sequential and simultaneous production, combined with various pressure maintenance systems. The analysis showed that the highest oil recovery is achieved with the oil rim development strategy that employs a combined reservoir pressure maintenance system: reinjection of 60% of produced gas and water injection. Optimal placement of horizontal wellbores at ¾ of the height from the gas-oil contact was proposed. The obtained results may help reduce the risks of gas and water breakthroughs, improve drainage efficiency, and increase cumulative oil production compared to alternative strategies during field commissioning. The study has practical value for planning the development of hard-to-recover reserves on the shelf.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. D. BeluginRussian Federation
Artem D. Belugin – Engineer 2nd Category of Development Department
Researcher ID: OGN-0500-2025
2, Sushchevsky Val St., Moscow, 127055
R. A. Zaitsev
Russian Federation
Roman A. Zaitsev – Head of Development Department
Researcher ID: ABA-6983-2022
2, Sushchevsky Val St., Moscow, 127055
M. A. Agupov
Kazakhstan
Mikhail A. Agupov – Integrated Modelling Manager
Researcher ID: OGO-8616-202
12 microdistrict, 74/1, Aktau, 130000
References
1. Zhdanov SA, Maksimov MM, Khavkin AYa et al. Designing the development of oil fields using geological and technological models. Oil Industry. 1997;(3):43-47.
2. Balin DV, Balina OV, Mamchistova EI. An approach to forecast production profiles, oil-gas ratio and water contamination probabilistic assessment. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2024;(3):139-156. https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2024.3.7 (In Russ.).
3. Gavura VE. Geology and development of oil and gas fields. Moscow: VNIIOENG; 1995. 496 p. (In Russ.).
4. Alokla K, Maalouf E, Ghorayeb K. Optimization guideline for thin oil rim reservoir development. Paper presented at: SEG/AAPG International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy; Houston, Texas; August 2024. https://doi.org/10.1190/image2024-4100200.1
5. John IJ, Matemilola S, Lawal K. Simple guidelines for screening development options for oil-rim reservoirs. Paper presented at: SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition; Lagos, Nigeria; August 2019. https://doi.org/10.2118/198718-MS
6. Latief AI, Syofyan S, Romanov I, Valerio RL, Shabibi TA. A strategic approach to address challenge of complex-thin oil rim development. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference; 2019. SPE-197385-MS. 26 p. https://doi.org/10.2118/197385-MS
7. Zolotukhin AA, Salikhov MR. Selection of the best development scenario for the thin oil rim with reservoir pressure maintenance system involving gas injection into the gas cap: Case study: West Masssoyakha PK 1-3 Horizon. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference and Exhibition; 2016. SPE-181917-MS. 17 P. https://doi.org/10.2118/181917-MS
8. Komin M, Magdeyev I, Schulze-Riegert R, Mukminov I. Multivariate asset assessment: Fast and reasonable decision on oil rims development on the example of a unique field in the Arctic onshore. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference; Moscow, Russia, 2018. SPE-191612-18RPTC-MS. 16 P. https://doi.org/10.2118/191612-MS
9. Triandi M, Chigbo I, Khunmek T, Ismail IM. Field case: Use of autonomous inflow control devices to increase oil production in a thin oil rim reservoir in the Gulf of Thailand. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference; Abu Dhabi, UAE; 2018. SPE-193305-MS. 12 P. https://doi.org/10.2118/193305-MS
10. Glumov IF, Malovitsky YP, Novikov AA, Senin BV. Regional geology and hydrocarbon potential of the Caspian Sea. Moscow: Nedra-Businesscenter; 2004. 342 p.: ill. ISBN 5-8365-0184-X (In Russ.).
11. Kryazhev VA, Kryazhev YA, Gilmanov YA, Shevelev AP. Method for selecting development mode of an oil and gas condensate reservoir using hydrodynamic modeling. Izvestiya Tomsk Polytechnic University. Engineering of Georesources. 2022;333(9):137-147. (In Russ.).
12. Kulesh VA, Islamov RR. Determination of critical gas-free production rate of oil wells using hydrodynamic modeling. Ekspozitsiya Neft Gas. 2023;5:58-62. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-6785-2023-5-58-62 (In Russ.).
13. Zaytsev RA, Martyushev DA. Justification of the optimal type of well completion profile based on retrospective evaluation of techno-economic performance. Georesursy. 2023;25(1):119-129. https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2023.1.12 (In Russ.).
14. El Gazar A, Bin Sumaida SA, Alklih MY, Al Shabibi TA, et al. Optimizing oil development of a super K compartmentalized reservoir with large gas cap and bottom water aquifer: Case study. Paper presented at: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference; November 2015; Abu Dhabi, UAE. SPE-177575-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/177575-MS
15. Gavura AV, Kashnikov KA, Nikiforov VP. Determination of recoverable oil reserves of an oil and gas deposit (oil rim) based on field data. Neftepromyslovoe delo Oilfield Engineering. 2019;12(612):5-8. https://doi.org/10.30713/0207-2351-2019-12(612)-5-8 (In Russ.).
16. Mamedov EA. Global deformations of fluid contacts before and during oil and gas field development: dissertation of cand. tech. sciences. Moscow: Institute of Oil and Gas Problems; 2007. 133 p. (In Russ.).
17. Severov AY. Improving oil field development efficiency in the presence of coning phenomena: dissertation of cand. techn. sciences. Moscow: Institute of Oil and Gas Problems; 2006. 158 p. (In Russ.).
18. Tasmukhanova AE, Shigapova RR. Features of offshore oil fields development. Vestnik Evraziyskoy Nauki Eurasian Science Bulletin. 2018;2. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-razrabotki-shelfovyh-mestorozhdeniy-nefti [Accessed 05 June 2025] (In Russ.).
19. Belugin AD, Magdeev ID, Chupeev AV, Gritsai IA. Development of algorithm for component recovery calculation to optimize offshore oil and gas fields development of the North Caspian. Oil and Gas Business. 2024;22(3):19-29. https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2024-3-19-29 (In Russ.).
20. Zaytsev RA, Raspopov AV. Experience in development of Perm region fields using horizontal wells. Vestnik Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Geology. Oil and Gas and Mining. 2020;20(2):182-191. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9923/2020.2.8 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Belugin A.D., Zaitsev R.A., Agupov M.A. Feasibility study for the choice of the development system for a massive oil rim of a large offshore field in the North of the Сaspian sea. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2025;(4):105-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.4.5
JATS XML


















