Preview

Science. Innovations. Technologies

Advanced search

Soundscape of Resort Towns in Caucasus Mineral Waters

https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2023.3.1

Abstract

Introduction. The article investigates the sound space of resort towns in Caucasus Mineral Waters by the example of the two largest of them, namely Pyatigorsk and Kislovodsk. The concept of the sound space of the city is considered, the main modern aspects of sound research in the city are highlighted. Based on the collected field data, an attempt is made to qualitatively assess the sound environment of cities, especially important for resort towns. For the central parts of the cities, the differentiation of the sound space was carried out, reflecting the type of social use of the territories.
Materials and research methods. The data of field measurements of sound in cities were obtained during the field practice of geography students in socio-economic geography in 2022. The cartographic method, normative approach and typology are used in the course of the study.
Research results and their discussion. The sound space of the studied resort towns has typical features of modern Russian cities. The resort function is not reflected in the sound space. The main factors of its formation are transport highways, human and commercial activities. Recreational areas are more comfortable in terms of sound, having their own internal specifics. In general, the level of noise pollution depends on the types of prevailing sounds in the territory. A microgeographic study of the central resort parts of the cities showed a complete lack of understanding and requirements for sound comfort.
Conclusions. In urban studies, there is an increase in interest in sound in the city, the allocation of sound space and its cultural and geographical differences. Sound can identify universal socio-cultural structures, act as a source of conceptual and methodological constructions. Sound studies help comprehend existing social practices and their contexts. The resort towns of the Caucasus Mineral Waters were founded without taking into account the comfort of the sound environment. As a result, the characteristics of their sound space do not differ from ordinary cities.

About the Authors

I. P. Suprunchuk
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation

Ilya P. Suprunchuk, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Socio-Economic Geography Institute of Earth Sciences

Scopus ID: 57199507380

Stavropol



V. V. Chikhichin
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation

Vasily V. Chikhichin, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Socio-Economic Geography Institute of Earth Sciences

Scopus ID: 57192369814

Stavropol



References

1. Vozyanov A. “A box for sounds?” On the soundscape of the city palace. Micro-urbanism. The city in details. M.: New Literary Review, 2014. P. 111–131. (In Russ.)

2. Glazychev V. L. City without borders. M.: Territory of the future, 2011. 400 p. (In Russ.)

3. Zamyatin D. N. Space and sound: towards spatial anthropologies of sound and sound. Sound and echo. Moscow: Heritage Institute, 2010. P. 131–142. (In Russ.)

4. Logutov A.V. Sound practices and the materiality of urban space. Urban research and practice. 2018. No. 2(4). P. 39–50. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp24201739-50 (In Russ.)

5. Chubukova M. A. Features of the sound environment of the Arbatsky district of Moscow. Urban research and practice. 2015. Pilot number. P. 67–79. https://doi.org/10.17323/usp00201568-79 (In Russ.)

6. Aletta F., Kang J., Astolfi A., Fuda S. Differences in soundscape appreciation of walking sounds from different footpath materials in urban parks. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2016. No. 27. P. 367–376.

7. Сolombijn F. Toooot! Vroooom! The Urban Soundscape in Indonesia. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 2007. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 255–272.

8. Feld S. Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics and Song in Kaluli Expressions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 1990. 297 р.

9. Mowitt J. Sounds: The ambient humanities. Oakland: University of California Press. 2015. 184 р.

10. Sakieh Y., Jaafari S., Ahmadi M., Danekar A. Green and calm: Modeling the relationships between noise pollution propagation and spatial patterns of urban structures and green covers. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2017. No. 24. P. 195–211.

11. Schafer R. M. Exploring the new soundscape. UNESCO Courier. 1976. November. Р. 4–8.

12. Schafer R.M. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. N. Y.: Knopf. 1977. 320 р.

13. Smith C.J. The acoustic experience of place: An exploration of the soundscapes of three Vancouver area residential neighbourhoods. National Library of Canada. 1994. 499 р.

14. Sterne J. The Sound Studies Reader. N. Y.: Routledge. 2012. 576 р.


Review

For citations:


Suprunchuk I.P., Chikhichin V.V. Soundscape of Resort Towns in Caucasus Mineral Waters. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2023;(3):7-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2023.3.1

Views: 133


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-4758 (Print)