Preview

Science. Innovations. Technologies

Advanced search

An Experiment in History Matching of the Multi- Reservoir Hydrodynamic Model of the Nydinsky Section of the Medvezhye Field

https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2023.3.6

Abstract

Introduction. History matching of a multi-layer model, where several layers are combined into one object and developed using a unified well grid, is complicated by the mutual influence of parameters (porosity, aquifer volume and intensity, permeability, productivity) on reservoir pressure, balance of production from the producing layers, and advancement of the water front. A change in any of the adjustable parameters of one layer entails a change in the controlled parameters of all interconnected layers.
Materials and research methods. The model of the Lower Cretaceous gas condensate deposits of the Nydinsky section of the Medvezhye deposit is a multi-layer one. The development objects consist of 3-4 layers. Each object is developed by an independent grid of wells. Each deposit is layer-uplifted, flooding occurs in the lateral direction. The analysis by the P/z method was carried out, according to the results of which the effect of the water pressure regime on the 2nd and 4th development site is observed, which must be reproduced in the model. Also, this method can indirectly indicate the amount of drained reserves.
Research results and their discussion. The configurable parameters for history matching are: reservoir pressure, the front of the reservoir water advance, gas production profiles for each well based on the PGI using a flow meter. The setting of the initial inflow profile is reproduced based on the results of the primary GIS. The correspondence of the inflow profiles of further GIS should be ensured by the correct distribution of the initial gas reserves across the layers inside the operational facility. Further, while maintaining the balance of the inflow profile, the formation pressure and the water advance front are adjusted by iteratively changing the volume and intensity of the aquifer and the pore volume.
Conclusions. The algorithm for history matching of a multi-layer model, in which several layers are developed by a single grid of wells, should begin with adapting the inflow profile to the initial date. Further redistribution of the production profile should occur iteratively due to the balance of reserves of deposits, volume and intensity of the aquifer, while taking into account the front of the advance of reservoir waters based on the results of observations on the well stock. Adjusting the inflow profile by changing kh is not recommended, since changing the inflow profile over time is most often not the function of kh. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the mutual influence of the above parameters of one formation on all other layers inside the operational facility.

About the Authors

K. K. Kurin
Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC
Russian Federation

Konstantin K. Kurin, Head of the Laboratory for Analysis and Design of field
Development in the Nadym district of the Center for Development and Exploitation of Fields in Western Siberia

Tyumen



I. A. Zagorodskikh
Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Zagorodskikh, Engineer of the Laboratory for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of deposits in Western Siberia of the Center for the Development and Operation of Deposits in Western Siberia

Tyumen



References

1. Vaganov E.V., Krasnov I.I., Tomskaya V.F., Levitina E.E.: Experience of execution WIW at wells exploiting gas condensate deposits of the Beregovoye field. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2021. No. 1. P. 27–38. (In Russ.)

2. Dyke L.P., The practice of reservoir engineering. Moscow: Izhevsk, 2008, 668 p. (In Russ.)

3. Ershov S.E., Merkulov A.V., Kirsanov S.A. and others. Modeling of the reaction of a water-pressure basin during the development of a deposit for depletion with an assessment of the effect of water-dissolved gas on the dynamics of the introduction of reservoir water. Gas Industry. 2014. No.12. P. 18–21. (In Russ.)

4. Zakirov S.N., Korshunova L.G., Nanivsky E.M.: Solving a twodimensional

5. inverse problem of the theory of gas field development. Col. of dev. and oper. gas. and gascond. VNIIEGazprom Publishing House. 1975. No. 12. 28 p. (In Russ.)

6. Zakirov S.N., Piskarev V.I., Geresh P.A., Ershov S.E.: A method for developing waterfowl gas and gas condensate fields. Patent of the Russian Federation 2107154. (In Russ.)

7. Zakirov S.N., Shmyglya O.P. Some questions of analysis of the development of gas fields in water–pressure mode, VNIIE – gazprom, 1971. 40 p. (In Russ.)

8. Kanevskaya R.D. Mathematical modeling of hydrodynamic processes of hydrocarbon deposits development: Izhevsk, 2002. 130 p. (In Russ.)

9. Kirsanov A.N., Laperdin A.N., Nelepchenko L.E. Methodology of operational processing of geological and geophysical information in the design and development of gas fields. Development and operation of gas and gas condensate fields, Rel. No. 4: pub. VNIIEGAZPROM, 1989. 69 p. (In Russ.)

10. Krasovsky A.V., Krotov P.S.: Using 3D–modeling to study the current reservoir conditions of the gas deposit of the Medvezhye deposit. Collection of abstracts of the XIV Scientific and Practical Conference of young scientists and specialists. Tyumen: LLC TyumenNIIgiprogaz, 2006. 316 p. (In Russ.)

11. Lapuk B.B. Theoretical foundations of the development of natural gas deposits: Izhevsk, 2002. 296 p. (In Russ.)

12. Mayer V.P. Reservoir simulation of oil, gas and water filtration in a porous medium. Ekaterinburg: "Putived", 2000. 207 p. (In Russ.)

13. Mirzajanzade A.H., Kuznetsov O.L., Basniev K.S., Aliyev Z.S. Fundamentals of gas production technology: Nedra, 2003. 880 p. (In Russ.)

14. Muravyev I.M., Andriasov R.S., Gimatudinov Sh.K., Govorova G.L., Polozkov V.T. Development and exploitation of oil and gas fields: "Nedra", 1970. 448 p. (In Russ.)

15. Nazarov A.V. The development of mathematical modeling for the design and analysis of the development of oil and gas condensate fields: dis. of Doctor of Technical Sciences. Ukhta, 2012. 427 p. (In Russ.)

16. Grigoriev B.A. et al. Review of works on the theory of filtration of hydrocarbon systems. Vesti gazovoi nauki. 2017. No. 2. P. 182–202. (In Russ.)

17. Syrtlanov V.R. On some questions of adaptation of models of hydrocarbon deposits. Theses of reports Conferences of Young scientists of OAO LUKOIL, Moscow, 2001. P. 198–236. (In Russ.)

18. Trebin F. A., Zakirov S. N., Kondrat R. M. et al. Investigation of the peculiarities of the manifestation of the water pressure regime in the development of gas fields. VNIIEGazprom, 1970. 57 p. (In Russ.)

19. Chivileva O.V., Abramov T.A., Khmara O.A. Determination of the nature of reservoir reservoir saturation and the type of deposits based on hydrodynamic researches and the study of reservoir samples. Problems of geology and subsoil development: XIV International Scientific Symposium of Students and Young Scientists named after Academician M.A. Usov. Tomsk, 2010. 580 с. (In Russ.)

20. Yushkov A.Yu., Krasovsky A.V., Tenkacheva I.Sh. : Methodol-ogy for constructing contact promotion maps when performing calculations on a three-dimensional gas-hydrodynamic model (theses). Problems of development of the gas industry in Western Siberia. Collection of abstracts of the XIII Scientific and Practical Conference of Young scientists and specialists. Tyumen: LLC TyumenNIIgiprogaz, 2004. 318 p. (In Russ.)

21. Luca Cosentino. Integrated Reservoir Studies. Editions Technip, Paris, 2001, 310 p.


Review

For citations:


Kurin K.K., Zagorodskikh I.A. An Experiment in History Matching of the Multi- Reservoir Hydrodynamic Model of the Nydinsky Section of the Medvezhye Field. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2023;(3):113-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2023.3.6

Views: 109


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-4758 (Print)