Features оf the Development of Oil and Gas Condensate Field in the Tomsk Region

Introduction. Oil and gas condensate field X is located in the Tomsk region and belongs to the Vasyugan oil and gas region of the West Siberian oil and gas province. In the section of the field, 5 development objects were identified: J1 1, J1 2, J1 3-4, J3 and J4-5. The studied objects are complex in terms of geological structure and phase state of the fluids. The factors complicating the development include low reservoir permeability, the presence of water-oil and gas-oil zones, the complex composition of the fluid, the phase state of the deposit is closeto critical. Studying the experience of developing complex objects is an urgent task. The resulting information can be further used in the design of the development of analogue deposits.
Materials and research methods. The object of the study is the operational facilities of the oil and gas condensate field X. The article presents the results of the analysis of the development of the field; the dynamics of technological indicators, the structure of the fund, and the energy state of the commissioned facilities are studied. The design and technical documentation for the development of the X field was used as an information source, including the materials of studies by the pressure recovery curve (PRC) method, on the basis of which the effect of a decrease in reservoir pressure on the productivity of production wells was established.
Research results and their discussion. At Field X, objects J1 1 and J1 2 were put into development, including oil and oil deposits with a gas cap. Gas condensate facilities are not operated. In general, the field is at the initial stage of development. For the J1 1 formation, according to the design document, a triangular well placement grid is implemented with a step of 700 m with the formation of an inverted seven-point flooding system. The J1 2 facility has a three-row development system 700 × 700 m. Despite the low porosity and permeability properties of the reservoirs, the input well flow rates are high, which is explained by the properties of the fluids of the X field. The only stimulation method currently used at the field is hydraulic fracturing. Adverse factors in terms of field development were identified during the analysis of the dynamics as regards the changes in reservoir pressure. A number of studies were carried out at the field to determine the effect of lowering reservoir pressure on the process of hydrocarbon production.
Conclusions. In the course of the studies carried out at the field, an irreversible negative effect of a decrease in reservoir pressure below saturation pressure on well productivity was revealed. Gas/oil ratio growth is noted even with a slight decrease in reservoir pressure, especially in the J1 1 formation. The introduction of injection wells allowed stabilizing the reservoir pressure, but the main problems in the development of these complex objects remain unresolved. To optimize the further exploitation of these deposits, a comprehensive implementation of the proposed design solutions is required.

1. Astafiev V.I., Fedorchenko G.D. Asymptotic analysis of the hydraulic fracture development process. Mathematical modeling and boundary value problems. 2010. No. 1. P. 32–36. (In Russ.).

2. Vaganov E.V., Sokhoshko S.K., Sarancha A.V. et al. Results of the elimination of water inflows in wells draining gas condensate deposits. Nauka. Innovation. Technologies. 2022. No. 2. Р. 7–24.

3. Wagner A.M., Telishev A.A. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing on the example of fields in the Noyabrsk region. News of higher educational institutions. Oil and gas. 1997. No. 6. P. 80. (In Russ.).

4. Goncharov I.V., Oblasov N.V., Smetanin A.V., Zhurova E.L., Voronkov A.A. Assessment of the phase state of one of the hydrocarbon deposits in the Tomsk region. Mining journal. 2012. No. 4. P. 21–32. (In Russ.).

5. Druzhinskaya Yu. A. Application of a set of studies to determine the geometry of hydraulic fractures in the fields of "Surgutneftegas". Scientific observer. 2017. No. 7. P. 48–50. (In Russ.).

6. Zemtsov Yu. V., Baranov A.V., Gordeev A.O. Review of physicochemical EOR methods used in Western Siberia and the effectiveness of their use in various geological and physical conditions. Neft. Gas. Innovations. 2015. No. 7. P. 11–21.

7. Kazakov IM Completion of wells – the most important stage in their construction. Drilling and oil. 2021. No. 1. P. 55–56. (In Russ.).

8. Kazetov S.I., Ismagilov S.F. Forecasting of indicator diagrams based on the modification of the Vogel formula. Bulatov readings. 2019. No. 2. P. 97–100. (In Russ.).

9. Classification of reserves and resources of oil and combustible gases. Regulatory and methodological documentation. Moscow: ESOEN Publ. 2016. 320 p.

10. Loginov A.V., Kolesnik V.P. Well productivity forecast after hydraulic fracturing and fracture geometry. Geology and oil and gas potential of the West Siberian megabasin (experience, innovations). 2012. No. 1. P. 193–196. (In Russ.).

11. Mastrikov A.V. Determination of hydraulic fracture parameters from the pressure drop curve obtained during mini-hydraulic fracturing. Forum of young scientists. 2018. No. 12–3. P. 242– 248. (In Russ.).

12. Meledin A. Methodology of substantiation of wells for multistage hydraulic fracturing on the example of Jurassic deposits of Western Siberia. Problems of geology and subsoil development. 2016. P. 363–364. (In Russ.).

13. Mulyavin S.F., Maslov V.N. Geology and development of oil and gas fields in Western Siberia. Monograph in two parts. Part I. Tyumen: TIU Publ., 2016. 268 p. (In Russ.).

14. Mulyavin S.F., Maslov V.N. Geology and development of oil and gas fields in Western Siberia. Monograph in two parts. Part II. Tyumen: TIU Publ., 2016. 150 p. (In Russ.).

15. Poplygin V.V., Poplygina I.S. Change in well productivity in Bobrikovsk terrigenous deposits of the upper Kama area with high gas saturation of reservoir oil. Bulletin of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Geology. Oil and gas and mining. 2012. No. 5. P. 63–69. (In Russ.).

16. Sabitov R.R., Shvechikov K.D. Decision-making model based on linear regression for planning hydraulic fracturing of the YuV1 facility of the Nivagalskoye field. Territory of oil and gas. 2014. No. 5. P. 88–91. (In Russ.).

17. Sokolov I.S., Pavlov M.S., Bosykh O.N. Experience in the development of a low-permeability formation with horizontal wells with multistage hydraulic fracturing. Oilfield business. 2020. No. 7. P. 10–16. (In Russ.).

18. Technological scheme for the development of the X oil and gas condensate field in the Tomsk region as of 01.01.2012. (In Russ.).

19. Khlebnikova M.E., Singizova V. Kh., Fakhretdinov R.N. Analysis of literary and patent sources on technologies of selective water isolation and elimination of behind-the-casing flows. Interval. 2003. No. 9. P. 4–22. (In Russ.).