Estimation of the maximum hail size based оn thermodynamic atmosphere parameters using neural network modeling methods
https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.4.3
Abstract
Hailstorms cause significant economic damage, especially in the agricultural sector. However, hail forecasting is performed with insufficient accuracy. Determining hail size, which directly affects the magnitude of losses, is also challenging. This study aims to estimate the maximum hail size based on atmospheric meteorological parameters. To this end, we compiled data on maximum hail size recorded by the Stavropol Militarized Hail Suppression Service, together with the corresponding temperature, humidity, wind direction, and wind speed at standard isobaric levels from a global atmospheric model, used as a substitute for upper-air sounding results. The study was based on neural-network modeling methods, with the diameter of the fallen hail as the dependent variable and atmospheric parameters as the independent variables. The SPSS environment automatically selected a neural model consisting of a single layer with four neurons. According to the results, the errors on the training and test samples were identical, indicating the adequacy of the model. Additional quality assessment criteria, such as prediction and residual plots, also confirmed the adequacy of the model. The key atmospheric parameters influencing the maximum hail size were found to be: the George instability index, the temperature at the convection level, the level at which the temperature difference between the cloud and the surrounding environment reaches its maximum, and the mean moisture deficit in the layer above the condensation level at an altitude of 5 km. It was concluded that the proposed neural-network model for estimating hail size can be effectively applied by services engaged in hail suppression.
About the Authors
L. T. SozaevaRussian Federation
Lezhinka T. Sozaeva – Cand. Sci. (Physics and Maths), Associate Professor, senior research associate of the laboratory of atmospheric convective phenomena
Scopus ID: 57204527832, Researcher ID: AIC-6568-2022
2, Lenin Avenue, Nalchik, 360001
A. Kh. Kagermazov
Russian Federation
Arthur Kh. Kagermazov – Cand. Sci. (Physics and Maths), head of the laboratory of atmospheric convective phenomena
Scopus ID: 55185153100
2, Lenin Avenue, Nalchik, 360001
References
1. Abshaev AM, Abshaev MT, Barekova MV, Malkarova AM. Guidelines for organizing and conducting anti-hail work. Nalchik: Pechatnyy dvor, 2014. 508 p. (In Russ.).
2. Kagermazov AKh. Digital atmosphere. Modern methods and methodology for the study of dangerous meteorological processes and phenomena. Nalchik: Pechatnyy dvor; 2015. 215 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kagermazov AKh, Sozaeva LT. Validation the output data of the global model of the atmosphere on data of aerological sensing with increscent lead time. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2020;(4):137–148 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kagermazov AKh, Sozaeva LT. Use of output data of the global model of the atmosphere (NCEP GFS) for forecasting thunderstorm processes with lead time of up to five days. Journal of Hydrometeorology and Ecology. 2021;(65):671-680. (In Russ.). https://doi.org//10.33933/2713-3001-2021-65-671-680
5. Writing our own neural network: a step-by-step guide. Available from: https://proglib.io/p/neural-nets-guide [Accessed 1 august 2025]. (In Russ.).
6. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A comprehensive Foundation (2nd Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998. 842 p.
7. Aggarwal CC. Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook. Springer; 2023. 541 p.
8. Climate change is showing its claws: The world is getting hotter, resulting in severe hurricanes, thunderstorms and floods. Available from: https://www.munichre.com/en/company/media-relations/media-information-and-corporate-news/media-information/2025/natural-disaster-figures-2024.html [Accessed 2 august 2025].
9. Dueben P, Wedi N, Saarinen S, Zeman C. Global simulations of the atmosphere at 1.45 km grid-spacing with the integrated forecasting system. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. 2020;98(3):551-572.
10. Dzombak B. Severe hailstorms are costly and hard to predict. Eos. 2021;(102). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EO158268
11. Haiden T, Janousek M, Vitart F, Ferranti L, Prates F. Evaluation of ECMWF forecasts, including the 2019 upgrade. ECMWF Technical Memorandum. 2019;(853).
12. IBM SPSS Statistics 27. Neural Networks Available from: https://www.ibm.com/docs/ru/spss-statistics/27.0.0/ [Accessed 4 august 2025].
13. National Centers for Environmental Prediction. Available from: https://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov [Accessed 4 august 2025].
14. Raupach TH, Martius O, Allen JT. et al. The effects of climate change on hailstorms. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2021;(2):213–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00133-9
15. Wellmann C. et al. Comparing the impact of environmental conditions and microphysics on the forecast uncertainty of deep convective clouds and hail. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020;(20):2201-2219.
Review
For citations:
Sozaeva L.T., Kagermazov A.Kh. Estimation of the maximum hail size based оn thermodynamic atmosphere parameters using neural network modeling methods. Science. Innovations. Technologies. 2025;(4):69-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2308-4758.2025.4.3
JATS XML


















